Now There’s Proof That Tiny Homes Are Better Homes
View Photos

Now There’s Proof That Tiny Homes Are Better Homes

Add to
Like
Share
By Jennifer Pattison Tuohy
New research shows that downsizing to a tiny home can cut your ecological footprint by 45%.

Downsizing to a tiny home also downsizes your carbon footprint. It might seem obvious that living smaller equates to a lighter impact on the environment—but now there’s proof. 

As part of her doctoral research at Virginia Tech, Dr Maria Saxton studied the ecological footprints and behaviors of 80 tiny home dwellers to see if small-space living really is a sustainable housing solution. Her research shows that simply living in a tiny home can reduce your impact on the environment by 45%—and the associated lifestyle changes yield further benefits.

Whether they downsized for financial freedom, more mobility, or a simpler lifestyle, all tiny home dwellers reduced their ecological footprint, the study showed.

Whether they downsized for financial freedom, more mobility, or a simpler lifestyle, all tiny home dwellers reduced their ecological footprint, the study showed.

Get the Tiny Homes Newsletter

Get carefully curated content filled with inspiring homes from around the world, innovative new products, and the best in modern design.

See a sample

"I found that after downsizing people were more likely to eat less energy-intensive food products and adopt more environmentally conscious eating habits, such as eating more locally and growing more of their own food," Saxton wrote in an article published in The Conversation. "Participants traveled less by car, motorcycle, bus, train, and airplane, and drove more fuel-efficient cars than they did before downsizing."

Saxton also found that tiny home owners bought significantly less stuff, recycled more, and generated less waste. This led her to surmise that we can be more eco-friendly simply by living smaller. 

Many tiny home dwellers develop eco-friendly habits when they downsize—like adopting a capsule wardrobe, carpooling more, and harvesting rainwater.

Many tiny home dwellers develop eco-friendly habits when they downsize—like adopting a capsule wardrobe, carpooling more, and harvesting rainwater.

Although some of the 100+ behaviors Saxton associated with downsizing had a negative environmental effect (including traveling more and eating out more often), close to 90% of the changes were positive.

Saxton's data goes so far as to show that we could save 366 million acres of biologically productive land if just 10% of Americans downsized to a tiny home. Saxton calculated the  impact of housing, transportation, food, goods, and services per hectare and found that tiny home downsizers in the US had an average ecological footprint of 3.87 global hectares compared to the average American’s footprint of 8.4 global hectares—a 45% difference.

This infographic summarizes Dr. Saxton's research on the ecological impact of living in a tiny home.

This infographic summarizes Dr. Saxton's research on the ecological impact of living in a tiny home.

While the trend for bigger houses continues to grow—the average US home size has increased by almost 1,000 square feet in the past 40 years—the negative impact our homes have on the environment has similarly grown. From loss of green space to increased air pollution and energy consumption, bigger homes have a larger effect on the planet.

Armed with proof that tiny homes can have a smaller impact, builders and designers of smaller living spaces can now better advocate for the creation of tiny home communities—and those trying to change zoning ordinances to support tiny homes will have evidence to support their case. "I hope this work will spur additional research that produces more affordable and sustainable housing choices for more Americans," says Saxton.

Dr. Saxton's full research report is available online here.

Related Reading:

12 Tiny House Companies That Can Make Your Micro-Living Dreams Come True

10 Tiny Home Dwellers You Should Follow on Instagram Right Now