Welcome to How They Pulled It Off, where we take a close look at one particularly challenging aspect of a home design and get the nitty-gritty details about how it became a reality.

In the 1980s, when he was in his mid-twenties, architect Lorcan O’Herlihy built a house for his parents on Trancas Canyon Road in Malibu. “It was really nice to give them a home back in ’87 that they really loved, and they were there for over twenty years,” says O’Herlihy. Decades later, years after his mom had sold the home, he got a call from the new owners: It had burned to the ground in Malibu’s 2018 Woolsey fires, and they hoped he might return to the site to rebuild with his firm, LOHA. And so began what he calls Trancas 2.0—only this time, the house would be made from concrete, to make it as fire resistant as possible.

“I like to say we rebuilt a new home out of the ashes out of the previous house,” says O’Herlihy.

The original house was made of plaster, itself a relatively noncombustible material in comparison to wood. But it did have a conventional roof (i.e., one with wood framing) that was no match for the flying hot embers generated by a strong wildfire. So this time, they settled on the idea of a “concrete defense system”: a concrete roof without eaves, as well as concrete walls, floors, and slab. The exterior is effectively a bunker specifically built to withstand fire. Once O’Herlihy and the clients decided on concrete, that simple fact drove the rest of the decisions. “We said, okay, how do we celebrate this wonderful, tactile, interesting house out of concrete?” he says.

Their choice of material wasn’t the only constraint. The Malibu Building Council would allow an expedited permitting process—but only if they kept the footprint to within 10 percent of the original building. Plus, the owners liked the flow of the original house, with the living room and kitchen positioned to take full advantage of ocean views. At the same time, O’Herlihy saw an opportunity to elevate his original design.

“We were in a sense keeping with the existing [house],” he says, “but we were free to reinterpret, probing the possibility of space, light, and materiality. And that’s what really drives the design.”

While the exterior is concrete, the interior is filled with wood. And the concrete itself is board form, so there’s a faint wooden impression to the walls. “All the colors are rather minimal, but there’s clarity,” says O’Herlihy. “Meaning we have concrete, we have wood—cedar and oak—and then we also have these concrete popups for light wells.” There are also floor-to-ceiling windows outlined in stark black frames. The result is a light-drenched, textured interior that layers all those elements—and, thanks to the primary building material, has the benefit of being cool in the summer and warm in the winter.

“The decision we made in terms of an overall solution to fight wildfires freed us up to bring these other qualities to the house—the tactility, the finer-scaled qualities to it, the refinement of the details, the wonderful balance between oak and cedar,” O’Herlihy explains.

How they pulled it off: Protecting the home against fire

The concrete shell of the house was the biggest fireproofing decision, particularly the roof—“You don’t want to have the roof as a potential fire hazard by having standard wood framing,” points out O’Herlihy—but not the only one.
The house also features additional passive fire protection elements to prevent ember intrusions, such as spark-arresting screens to protect any vulnerable, combustible spots.
There’s drought-tolerant landscaping, which stops a safe distance from the house.
A sprinkler system wraps the perimeter to saturate the building in an emergency, plus there’s a pool that could provide additional water for firefighting purposes.

But of course, there’s no such thing as a truly invulnerable house, something that has been top of mind for the architect since the recent devastating Los Angeles fires. “I think what we did is as close as possible to what one can do” in terms of fire resistance, O’Herlihy says. But at the same time, he stresses that there’s only so far that individuals can go, and those efforts have to work in partnership with robust efforts by federal, state, and local authorities. “If it’s just one or the other, it’s not going to solve a problem.”

“I’m very happy with it—I think it turned out to be wonderful,” he adds. “I think spatially it’s a really exciting house.”

Project Credits:

Architect: Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects / @loharchitects

Photography: Paul Vu

Related Reading:

How They Pulled It Off: A Greenhouse on Top of a Former Garage

How They Pulled It Off: A House Built Into a Hill