Advertising
Advertising
Related Products
-
London Skyline Coasters
by Richard CowardThe London Festival of Architecture partnered…
-
London Tray
by Maria DahlgrenOur love for London knows no bounds, and we'll…
-
Big Chill Stove
It has that postwar appliance feel, without…









It's really too bad the photo doesn't show any of the actual energy saving parts of the house. Once again architecture is guilty of fetishizing the building as an object for the purpose of publishing 'cool' images. Obviously architecture feels compelled to market itself through coolness, but these days I'll bet that you would get a client by just showing a photo of the wind catcher or the well lit common spaces on the second floor. Coolness isn't getting a lot of firms too far in this economy and most people have written off architecture as an irrelevant luxury. The image just represents another architect's attempt at modern form with some token sustainable ingredients.
a little more detail found here: http://www.sheppardrobson.com/projects/page.cfm?projectID=100158
@Kevin, it should be noted that the article in the magazine did have a diagram, in which the editors explained, roughly, how the windcatcher technology works. also, the article was never written, in any capacity, by the architects, so you can't really blame them for the pictures used in the magazine. furthermore, you can"t blame the editors all that reasonably either, considering dwell is a publication based on "modern architecture", a term entailing not savings, (which only recently has begun to take hold in the modernist mind, though it is rapidly growing as a defining characteristic of the age) but rather an artistic sensibility- as you so bluntly put it, the "coolness". even so, they put across the message of affordable, sustainable, attractive living fairly well, i reckon. i also disagree with you by the reasoning that "coolness" is generally a good selling point when its not the only one, and more often than not, it isn't. i do understand your concern, however, and i suggest that you email the editors, because, to my knowledge, they don't read our comments. conversely, if you contact them directly, they are more likely to do something about your concerns. i imagine they have quite a bit of clout in the architectural community.
RSS Feed
Add a Comment