Lisa Heschong, a California architect with the Heschong Mahone Group, which specializes in research on building performance, doesn’t think much of firelight: “The use of fire for lighting, while romantic, is extraordinarily inefficient, energy intensive, and potentially polluting. Indoor combustion is one of the main sources of indoor air pollution, especially in the third world.” Cities like Sacramento, California, even limit wood-burning fireplaces to keep skies clearer. “In our climate,” Heschong explains, ”the presence of smoke in the winter increases the prevalence of soot, thereby reducing daylight.”
But what about the romance loophole? Photographer Bill Wadman loves the flame’s amber hue for exactly that reason: “Firelight is extremely warm in color, shifted very much toward orange, so it gives some of the same advantages that the ‘magic hour’ does just after sunset. I think it’s ingrained in us to equate this warm color and the warmth of the fire itself with the concept of home and security. And because of the way skin reflects light, warmer light tends to be more flattering and diminish flaws in portraits. Pleasing, yes, but accurate? Not a chance.” Which works just fine for romance.