Spirit of the South
With neighboring duplexes supplying rental income, two Knoxville architects patiently—and affordably—craft their dream home.
They never actually wanted a house. But after a chance sighting and an architectural reincarnation, Tricia Stuth and Ted Shelton, founders of Curb, ended up with three.
They purchased a historic duplex and bracketed it with two new houses, similar in form to the originals but wholly modern.
So they started pushing their boundaries outward and reconsidered more traditional residential options. One afternoon, when riding their bikes near Old North Knoxville, a “streetcar neighborhood” where trolleys once shuttled working-class Knoxvillians the mile or so to and from downtown, Stuth and Shelton spotted a two-family house that appealed to them. Built between 1911 and 1917, the quirky duplex had a generous front porch, decades of peeling paint, overscaled wood ornamentation, and a quarter-acre lot. They bought it for $120,000 and soon moved into one side and had tenants in the other.
Stuth and Shelton’s dining area, like their bedroom, and the rest of their house, is a work in progress. The couple keeps an eye out for deals on materials to complete their laundry list of unfinished projects. Recently, a local surplus building supply happened to have just enough extra maple to finish their floors. They jumped on it. “We’re just waiting for the right opportunities,” Shelton says.
Soon after they started working on the designs, the hoop-jumping began. In the time since the construction of the original houses, the site had been zoned for suburban development, stipulating one house per lot. Local regulators, wary of increasing neighborhood density, didn’t embrace the idea of building the houses back. But after five public meetings, the couple managed to convince skeptics that their design was simply reestablishing a traditional role for the historic neighborhood, which had long offered dense housing close to downtown. Details in the plans took cues from the old houses, paying homage to their Southern past—generous overhangs, south-facing porches, and natural ventilation—while remaining open internally, unlike those of their compartmentalized predecessors. “The shells were designed to be sympathetic with the older house,” Shelton explains. “But inside, they play by different rules.”
The couple eventually got the go-ahead, thanks to growing support for the project that was influenced, perhaps, by nostalgia for what had once been there. “The memory of the houses haunted this site,” Shelton says. “People in Knoxville knew they were here. It was a living memory.”
The kitchen countertops are made from affordable laminated oak intended to line the beds of tractor-trailers, which the couple coated with Salad Bowl Finish to create a food-safe surface.
The couple started building the new duplex first but immediately ran into trouble: It turned out the land on the eastern half of the lot was unstable. Shoring up the soil, using filter fabric, compacted fill, and flowable fill (a kind of low-viscosity concrete), meant short-term compromises. “We were $50,000 behind before we even started,” Shelton says. “All the interior finishes for our own house went into that hole.”
To keep costs under control they kept finishes in the new duplex simple and durable, opting for polished-concrete floors, clear-sealed plywood walls, and simple white drywall. The main cost savings came from maximizing the rentable space, carving out two two-bedroom apartments in a 1,770-square-foot footprint. They created a sense of volume by siting bedrooms on split levels and incorporating sliding walls that allow tenants to expand and contract their living spaces as needed.
Their tenants include veterinary student Leslie Carter and intern architect Brad Raines.
In both new buildings, the couple splurged on systems that would result in savings later—for example, advanced framing, two layers of insulation, and an instantaneous water heater that creates hot water on demand. The interior finishes will come in time. The stairs leading to the next floor are temporarily constructed of two-by-fours. A galvanized-metal cattle trough stands in for the Japanese-style ofuro tub they hope to install one day. Handwritten instructions to the builders are jotted on the interior walls. The front porch remains unenclosed.
Their own house may be evolving, but the four units Stuth and Shelton rent are fully leased, mostly to architecture students. Eventually they’ll replenish their bank accounts and finish their punch list. But in the meantime, it seems fitting that at least one of the Ghost Houses sits in a kind of limbo, like its spirit-world namesake.
Don't miss a word of Dwell! Download our FREE app from iTunes, friend us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter!
Advertising
Advertising
Advertising
Related Products
-
Riverstone Black Heart
Silvery-black pebbles encased in a transparent…
Latest
-
05.16
The Making of Screenplay: Part 7
Jenny Wu, a partner at Oyler Wu Collaborative, documents the…
-
05.16
ICFF Preview: Plank by Eric Pfeiffer and Council
Oakland-based designer Eric Pfeiffer has been exhibiting…
-
05.14
LEGO® Design Competition Finalists
Dwell joined forces with Pacific Standard Time to appeal to…
Follow
Dwell
Reloading tweets…














Great article behind the slideshow! Wish as always I could see plans and more photographs. Hope you don't go overboard with the finishes...I find that unfinished look very appealing!
These new houses do not look like they were designed at all. They look shoddy, and like they pay homage to trailer parks, but without the character and nostalgia that years of wear can bestow. I can't help but think of The Emperor's New Clothes when I read stories like this. On the other hand, the duplex in the middle looks great.
There is no way that duplex sat with empty lots on either side of it, so I wonder what older homes they tore down to build those two modern monstrosities. They look like prefab horrors. And who in their right mind would want to rent a duplex that has bare plywood walls in it? I think they did it hoping to flip the houses and got stuck with them when the market crashed.
There is not much here that looks successful. Obviously, the execution is weak, and the interiors are unfinished. The new structures look barely functional. It might have been more interesting for the readers if Dwell and the owners/architects had honestly discussed where the project has been unsuccessful (at least so far). To blame it on the soil problems is a little embarrassing.
Speaking for myself, I think I sympathize with what the owners/architects were trying to accomplish here. It is hard to form an opinion about the design from the scattered photos, but the actual construction looks crude and poorly done. Not everything built with plywood, concrete block and white sheetrock is well designed and well constructed. From the same issue, the house in Bozeman looks to me to have been very much more successful in terms of design and construction. It was built on a tight budget and partly by the owner.
I think the architects/owners did okay, but that's it. There were definitely a number of material decisions that they will learn from "the hard way". That plywood wall is not cool; I'm glad I saw this so I keep in mind to not do something like that. It sucks that they were under a tight budget because I would like to see them make a better studio for themselves. The "worn-out" look on some of the earlier pictures is not working. Try paint it up a grade, I guess...
RSS Feed
Add a Comment