Creative Commons
Craving not just a home but a proper piece of architecture, a handful of design- and business-savvy Dutch families banded together, hired an architect, and set about forming the community that would net them the houses of their dreams.
With the idea of communal living all too prone to conjure visions of student squalor or hippy homeliness, Villa van Vijven comes as a refreshing surprise. The strikingly sculptural bright orange building, reclining in the flat Dutch landscape, accommodates five families under a single, stylish roof. And there’s not a whiff of carob in the air.
Step into any one of its five apartments and you are convinced that you've entered an independent piece of architecture entirely. Though they vary in size (the largest is 3,200 square feet), each unit has a panoramic view of the surrounding landscape and its own distinctive layout, decor, and, of course, inhabitants. The group ranges from a business manager to a sports coach to an art historian. “We don’t necessarily see each other every day,” says Paula van Dijk (the art historian). “Often, we just say hello when leaving or coming home again.” Cees Noordhoek, a sales manager who lives here with his wife, Jacquelien, and three kids, adds: “It just doesn’t really feel like communal living.”
Marianne Schram reads in her bedroom while her husband, Koos Sweringa, looks in from the stairs below.
Yet Villa van Vijven is a truly collective and collaborative project, financed and commissioned by five families (19 people in total) who wanted to build a home that they could otherwise never afford: an architecturally high-impact retreat set in extensive gardens, with great views of the surrounding landscape and nearby lake. Residents Johan Bouwmeester and Marlene Blokhuis got the ball rolling when they found the large plot to the southwest of the new and rapidly growing city of Almere, an hour from Amsterdam. The appeal of the relatively rural setting, just 10 minutes from the center of the city, was manifest, and the couple began inviting design-minded acquaintances to join in on the project.
Nineteen-year-old Yvette Sweringa arrives at the villa by bike.
The next step was to find the right architect, one able to embrace the kind of co-creation process that the group needed to accommodate their five different dream homes under one roof. “Our first architect bullied us,” Noordhoek recalls. “But then someone told us about this promising young office, Next Architects. So we did two workshops with them and found that they were able to focus our rambling thoughts. That was enough to convince us.”
With the architect on board, the business of obtaining financing, permits, and other essential administration was handled, Noordhoek says, “in the same way we organized all details—by mandate. For every part of the process we appointed two managers, who did the field research, asked for competitive bids from suppliers, and had the power to act on behalf of the group. The group as a whole was presented with a detailed proposal for a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote. We felt that discussions and emotions shouldn’t be allowed to run loose. We knew that only when we acted like professional managers would it be possible to build the house on schedule and within budget.”
Paula van Dijk (left) poses with her sister, Vera.
The same tough principles were applied to the design process. “Difficulties mainly arose when individual preferences collided with another person’s interests,” Noordhoek says. “But in every case of conflicting preferences, we simply let the architect make the decision. Usually, that worked.”
“It was very different from having one client,” says architect Michel Schreinemachers of Next Architects. “With a group, you have another dynamic entirely.
Yet it worked quite nicely.” At many steps along the way Schreinemachers would propose several options, which the group would discuss and then return with feedback. The final decision, though, was always the architect’s. “If I’d suggested the eventual building at the outset, they would have walked away,” he adds. “They wanted something very industrial, or thought they did. But they always wanted something architecturally interesting, a landmark building, and this design grew out of our discussions.”
Bob Krone and Paula van Dijk go for a walk while Lucas and Jillis Noordhoek lounge on the grass. Their parents, Jacquelien and Cees Noordhoek, chat farther to the right.
Schreinemachers visualized the space as a block of rectangles that he rotated to face different directions, adding and subtracting volumes to reflect the residents’ wishes. The result is a Tetris-like layering of interlocking shapes, each with its own character and its own signifying color as visualized in the plans. “When Michel finished his drawings, everyone had to choose the unit they wanted—it was the moment of truth!” Noordhoek says. “And each of the five groups went for a different one, which shows how well the architect interpreted our wishes.”
Personal wishes could often be indulged, given that the truly communal areas of the project are just the large garden (each family also has a small private garden as well) and what Schreinemachers calls “the public square” onto which all the front doors open: a glowing orange space carved out underneath the building, where the residents tend to leave their bicycles and bump into each other on the way in or out. This feature, van Dijk says, “gives the building a really playful quality, as does its great openness to the garden.” Schreinemachers reports that he achieved it “by raising the living room up to the second floor. You can walk straight into the garden from the living rooms, over the terrace.”
Van Dijk's framed pictures stacked on the floor form an impromptu point of visual interest.
Schreinmachers chose orange for the exterior to reference the traditional orange-tiled rooftops of Dutch country buildings. Echoing the splashy chromatics of the outside, the residents quickly set about brightly painting their own interiors. In Paula van Dijk and Bob Krone’s minimal white space, for example, there’s a vivid splash of yellow, while Koos Sweringa, seeking a bit of formal instruction, attended a color course that inspired a whole palette of shades.
Color aside, the actual interior design was left to the residents themselves—to keep costs down they moved into bare spaces. Undaunted by empty expanses of naked walls and flooring, each family created an interior that satisfies their individual desires and shows a strong sense of ownership. Noordhoek (who took the green unit) sought ample floor space for his large family, and thus his unit is a generous 3,200 square feet. Bob Krone and Paula van Dijk (who took the red apartment) wanted “big, open spaces with long walls for hanging paintings and as few doors as possible.” Koos Sweringa and Marianne Schram (whose two college-age daughters usually stay at the yellow apartment with them on weekends) wanted a “live-in” kitchen that resides in the place of honor that the other families have assigned to the living room. They also have a capsule kitchen next to their bedroom on the second floor, plus a view of the historic tower of Naarden from the same room.
Though the architecture favors idiosyncrasy over uniformity, when it comes to each other, the residents are all quick to note that pragmatism is what they value most. They are unanimously keen to emphasize that they are best neighbors, not best friends. Thus, they maintain a fund for the upkeep of the house and are working on the idea of a shared amphitheater with a fireplace for the garden. But house meetings are kept to a minimum—far fewer than the twice-monthly gatherings demanded by the five-year development process. “The biggest advantage of living together is that we can use each other’s expertise,” Krone says. “Another advantage is that when you’re on vacation, there’s someone to pick up the mail, water the plants, and feed the pets.”
Even while enjoying all these advantages, “I think we all still wonder what on earth it was that made us go for this unusual design,” Noordhoek says, as he strolls through the garden. “But it just stands out in every respect,” he adds, turning to look at the villa. “It surprises me every day that we dared to do it. It really is the building of our dreams.”
To see more images of the project, please visit our slideshow.
Advertising
Advertising
Advertising
Related Products
-
Villa van Vijven Print
by Adrian JohnsonCommunal living has never looked better than…
-
Caravan Dresser
by Kalon StudiosFrom the front, this dresser gives just a hint…
-
Communicators Bowls
by Marti GuixéNo one likes being the first guest to reach…
Latest
-
02.09
An Architecture Guide to Pyongyang
German architect and writer Philipp Meuser realizes that…
-
02.08
Fair Chairs
We continue our coverage of the 2012 Stockholm Furniture and…
-
02.07
Seven from Stockholm Design Week
It's about mid-way through the 2012 Stockholm Design Week and…
Follow
Dwell
-
At the top of the monumental staircase @bsaspace by Howeler+Yoon. Awesome opening tonight @bsaaia! http://t.co/z9cli8TT #design
-
Thanks, @dailytekk, for including @dwell on your list of 100 Best, Most Interesting Blogs & Websites! http://t.co/hbMnDiTO #design
-
Was Mario Manningham's Super Bowl catch a work of #architecture? http://t.co/zxD47gN1
-
“@archpaper: Move over Ice Cube, Moby jams to #architecture, launches new blog about Los Angeles: http://t.co/eVKNB5WK”






















I love the sliding window. It's a great solution for something I'm planning. Did you make it or was it an off-the shelf product?
A worthy concept, with interesting execution. However, I'm surprised by the lack of community "street", which is relegated to the below-grade entrances area. This would not be desirable in an urban setting, and I'm not sure it works here either. Would like a follow-up article on this project, after the residents have had a few years to further adapt their spaces.
Stunning contrast - bold rectalinear form vs gently rolling green pasture. While we would not be able to offer the same amount of open space in our development model we do offer the same shared experience in our "You Own" and "You Share" urban multi-family custom housing products. We feel the time is right to pursue the redevelopment of a wide selection of 'for sale', stalled, foreclosed and abandoned properties in Brooklyn, NY with the future homeowner as our development partner. If you are interested in learning more, check us out at: www.myhomebrooklyn.com
What a great commentary on the way we live and redefining what it means to be home. Thank you!
A most incredible adaptation of condominium living where the owners have the inspiration instead of a developer and the result is something truly exciting. Looking at the color coded plan I can't help but think of Moshe Safde's "Habitat" in Montreal. Shared spaces that intertwine but maintain independence. It would seem in both Habitat and this building the shared experience comes from mutual appreciation of concepts of living and appreciation of the buildings themselves.
This is an absolutly fabulous idea. The sense of a community living under one brilliantly designed roof is wonderful. I would love to live in a house like this. I would enjoy having neighbors that close and sharing the cost of the land while still being able to have a "dream house". Stunning. Thanks for featuring this Dwell.
What is the floor material in this house? I love the (what looks like) a black tile floor??? Does anybody know if its ceramic, slate, or polished concrete?
this is what a progressive society looks like.
what is the flooring material in slides 5, 11, and 12? thanks
Wow, I'm loving it, the design for this house is just awesome, I like the green surrounding, feel so peaceful and quite.
Other than the fact this is in Holland and it's orange, there seem to be few redeeming qualities to this little development. Yes there are five units together, but other than that it seems like it's just plopped down in the middle of nowwhere, some suburb with a view of a lake. The entries to the units are just awful, a concrete P.T. slab is what it looks like just looming inches above your head with some very pedestrian looking lighting...and Super Graphics are the best they can come up with to mark the entries in the 21st Century?? Depending on the area, the entryway looks totally dangerous and probably very uninviting and dangerous at night....Sorry, just because it's in Europe doesn't mean it's good design.....
"the entryway looks totally dangerous and probably very uninviting and dangerous at night...." What are you talking about? This is a private community, not in the city.
I LIKE the sheltered feel of the entry; it didn't strike me as dangerous provided the structure was in a reasonably safe area. However, I can understand why a city dweller might be uncomfortable with its seclusion. I thought the Tetris-like stacking and combining of the different units was a stroke of genius!
RSS Feed
Add a Comment